And the winner of the Stupidest Comment of the Week is......
Possibly one of the most ridiculous claims you have ever made. And that's up against some stiff competition.
So go on then - explain how, according to you, seeing as you believe they were all swingers, Scotland Yard are attempting, deliberately, to help an enormous group of swingers escape justice.
A reply from Textusa
This was my reply to her
Nope, doesn't work like that. You are the one making the claims, it's up to you to prove them. My opinions about the case have no bearing on whether you tell the truth (ha!) or not. I choose with whom I share my opinions, and you, dear, didn't make the list. I sincerely doubt the process would ''educate'' your readers, if such a feat were even possible, which frankly, for many of them, it isn't.
So shall we try again?
Explain how, according to you, seeing as you believe they were all swingers, Scotland Yard are attempting, deliberately, to help an enormous group of swingers escape justice?
For the avoidance of doubt, I'll make this very clear.
If I had a blog in which I made claims about the case or people involved in it, it would be a reasonable expectation that I would back those claims up.
I don't. If I ever do, I will expect to provide justification for any claims I make
Textusa does. If the claims she made were fair or established as truth, that would be fair enough. However, she doesn't present them as opinion, she presents them as FACT and frequently claims to have 'proved'or established those claims. As such, I believe she should have an expectation of being challenged to provide evidence.
Textusa's reply is nothing more than an avoidance tactic, and will not be indulged. I think the reason for her squirming is quite obvious - she is totally unable to justify her claims. This will become even more apparent if she continues to refuse.
We didn't expect that you would be able to provide anything with which to back up your claims, hence these avoidance tactics.
Don't worry, Textusa, we are all quite used to you making false claims. We'll stick this one on the slate with the others.
And the next day, latest bullshit instalment
So, Textusa's answer to the question:
''Explain how, according to you, seeing as you believe they were all swingers, Scotland Yard are attempting, deliberately, to help an enormous group of swingers escape justice?''
......is that she refuses to give one. As expected
Amusing to see the mass panic from your minions, who realise you have no answer to the question, Textusa.
It is, however, apparent from my postbag that your refusal to answer the question, and your desperate flannelling has not gone unnoticed.
You really should think before you open your mouth. It has got you into so much trouble before. You tell one fib, you have to tell a dozen more to cover it up. You made up a story about a man killing a little girl, despite the fact that there was no evidence to support this. It's nothing more or less than your rather disturbing fantasy.
You supported your fantasy with other fantasy tales
You are not someone who comments on the case. You are a sad, middle-aged woman who gets her rocks off by writing sexual fairy stories.
You don't give a shit about who you defame, demean or disturb. Your one saving grace is that no-one takes too much notice as it is more than apparent that you are completely off your rocker.